Less Than 91 Days in UK Not Enough for UK Tax

The saga of Mr Gaines-Cooper began in October 2006, when the Special Commissioners (now part of the Tax Tribunals) determined that despite him seeking to claim residency in the Seychelles, he had remained resident in the UK.

A key part of Mr Gaines-Cooper's case was that he had relied on guidance issued by HMRC (known as IR20) that set out the circumstances in which an individual would, or would not, be treated as resident in the UK and therefore liable to UK income and capital gains tax. A key part of the guidance that Mr Gaines-Cooper relied on was that spending less than 91 days a year in the UK would mean that he could not be treated as UK resident.

Davies and James relied on different guidance in IR20 that individuals who go abroad to work under a full-time contract of employment would also not be treated as resident in the UK.

More here: UK Tax for Contractors and Persons Abroad

leon - your favouretest interim manager

Save Electricity Monitor Released in SA

Excellent new product released in South Africa to save elctricity:

The Eco-Eye Elite has the largest display unit on the market so you can see your electricity consumption at a distance.  Its unique forecasting function predicts your electricity bill so you are able to proactively make relevant changes to your energy consumption habits before you have to pay for them.

Updating every two seconds and storing 31 days and 32 months data, puts you in control of your energy management programme.  The unit is exceptionally easy to use making it ideal for the less technically inclined.

With a range of over 90 meters, it’s unlikely that you will ever loose any signal from the transmitter unit.

More information on how to save electricity here.

Should SMB's Move Away from Big Banks

Should SMB’s Move Away from Big Banks

by leon

Small businesses are less successful at securing loans from the biggest banks in the U.S than are customers at other commercial banks, per an NFIB report. Experts cited big banks’ reliance on automated credit scores as opposed to the more relationship-driven, labor-intensive credit analysis done by smaller banks. “It appears that the nation’s largest banks have not filled the credit needs of their small business customers nearly as well as smaller institutions have filled the needs of theirs,” the NFIB report says.
More here: NFIB Report for Small Business Loans

Your favorite freelance project manager

AddThis

Never Waste a Thank You Letter

Never Waste a Thank You Letter

by leon

Brad Remillard from Impact Hiring Solutions wrote a great article on using a “Thank You” note or letter to full advantage:

Excerpt:
After an interview, sending a “Thank You” letter is common etiquette and a nice thing to do, but saying “thank you” should not be the main reason for sending it. Most candidates send one after interviewing with a company, but as a recruiter, I rarely receive one. I personally don’t need one, but on the occasions when I have received one, I think the candidate misses a great opportunity by just saying, “Thank you for the interview.”

I believe a good “Thank You” letter should be used to reinforce your ability to do the job and/or address any potential issues that came up during the interview. It can be another marketing document. It is important not to over do it, but a tactful letter, that does some subtle marketing can have a big impact on the person reading it.

See the full article at: Impact Hiring Solutions

From your mostest favourite freelance project manager

Do You Have a Career Brand?

Do You Have a Career Brand?

Greig Wells from Be Found Jobs discusses the issues most executive job searchers experience.

The focus is on creating a brand for yourself in the career environment and Greig tells you how to do this.

(Audio fades from 2.27 to 2.47 and the meaty information starts at 4.27)

Enjoy from your favouritest business project manager

AddThis

Technorati Tags: ,

Other Related Posts:

-->

How to Recognize the Indispensable Person

How to Recognize the Indispensable Person

by leon[edit]

Some people just “have” it – that aura of being indispensable in an organization.
And no…… it does not boil down to political games, or having hundreds of meetings, or creating busyness or creating paper.

Jacqueline Novogratz discusses how to recognize a linchpin in an organization:

Jacqueline Novogratz on how to recognize a linchpin from Seth Godin on Vimeo.

By your mostest favourite Freelance Project Manager

Ten Management Fads - Take Note CEO's

Ten Management Fads – Take Note CEO’s

by leon

Love you Liz – one of the most logical and sensible articles I have seen in a long while!

By Liz Ryan

Every few years, a management book or philosophy emerges to change our thinking about the best ways to lead employees.

From The One Minute Manager to Who Moved My Cheese?, new and revived leadership concepts have shaped the way we organize, evaluate, inspire, and reward team members. With so many competing management theories in the mix, some ill-conceived practices were bound to take hold—and indeed, many have. Here’s our list of the 10 most brainless and injurious:

1. Forced Ranking

The idea behind forced ranking is that when you evaluate your employees against one another, you’ll see who’s most critical on the team and who’s most expendable. This theory rests on the notion that we can exhort our reports to work together for the sake of the team 364 days a year and then, when it really counts, pit them against one another in a zero-sum competitive exercise. That’s a decent strategy for TV shows such as Survivor but disastrous for organizations that intend to stay in business for the long term. What to do instead: Evaluate employees against written goals and move quickly to remove poor performers all the time (not just once a year).

2. Front-Loaded Recruiting Systems

All the rage in the corporate hiring arena, so-called front-loaded hiring processes require candidates to surmount the Seven Trials of Hercules before earning so much as a phone call from your HR staff. Those trials can include credit checks, reference checks, online honesty tests, questionnaires, sample work assignments, and other mandatory drills that signal “We’ll just need you to crawl over a few more bits of broken glass, and you may get that interview.” Don’t be fooled by job-market reports—talented, creative employees are as hard to snag as ever. Insulting and demeaning hiring practices are a big reason. What to do instead: Dismantle your Kafka-esque recruiting system and give hiring power back to your hiring managers. They’ll thank you for it, and the quality and speed of your recruitment will skyrocket.

3. Overdone Policy Manuals

You know who’s making money for your employer right now? Workers who are selling, building, or inventing stuff. You know who’s spending the business’s money right now? Other employees (most easily found in HR, IT, and Finance) who’ve been commanded to write, administer, and enforce the 10,000 policies that make up your company’s employee handbook. Overblown policy efforts squelch creativity, bake fear into your culture, and make busywork for countless office admins, on top of wasting paper, time, and brain cells. What to do instead? Nuke one unnecessary or outdated policy every week and require the CEO’s signature to add any new ones.

4. Social Media Thought Police

It’s reasonable to block Youtube (GOOG) in the office because of the bandwidth it consumes. The recent e-mail message I received from a worker who’d just been informed of her employer’s “no LinkedIn profiles permitted” policy sets a new low for organizational paranoia. Memo to your general counsel: Human beings work in your business, not robots or replicants. People have lives, brands, and connections beyond your walls, and those human entanglements are more likely to help your business than to hurt it. What to do instead: Treat people like babies only if you want them to act like babies. Let the rest of them update their LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter accounts appropriately, and if they’re not getting their work done, deal with that problem on its own.

5. Rules That Force Employees To Lie

You won’t be shocked to hear that a majority of working people believe their employers don’t trust them. We throw gas on the fire when we install rules that encourage our employees to lie. A great example is the time-honored policy that says “Congratulations on the upcoming birth or adoption of your baby. We’ll pay your insurance premiums while you’re on maternity leave if you’re planning to return to work afterward. If not, you’ll be terminated when your leave starts, and pay your own premiums.” Which Einstein dreamed up that brain-dead policy? What to do instead: Pay the same percentage of insurance premiums for all employees in a category (e.g. new moms) without requiring pointless declarations of their intentions. Don’t allow any new rules (sick-time policies are a prime offender) that reward employees for withholding information.

6. Theft of Miles

Saving money is in, but taking it out of employees’ hides in the form of stolen frequent-flier miles is the hallmark of a Mickey Mouse outfit. If your employees are trotting the globe to advance your cause, let them keep their hard-earned air and hotel miles. (Have you flown economy class recently?) What to do instead: Tell your travel agent to book one-stop flights in place of non-stop ones, saving a few bucks.

7. Jack-Booted Layoffs

It’s no shame to have to reduce your workforce, but why treat departing employees like convicted felons? Anyone who tells you that an RIF requires perp-walk guided exits is someone to add to the next layoff list himself. One-on-one pink-slip discussions and dignified, non-immediate departures are the new norm for ethical organizations. If you have to march your loyal, redundant co-workers out the door, it says lots about the kind of workplace you’ve built. What to do instead: Deal with performance problems independently of staff reductions. Treat those employees you’re forced to let go like the mature professionals they are.

8. 360-Degree Feedback Programs

I have a second-grader, and if my second-grader has something to say to his little friend Dylan, I encourage him to say it directly. I don’t tell him, “Fill out this form, and we’ll have the other kids fill out forms, too, and then we’ll tell Dylan what all the kids think of him, anonymously.” Apart from the fact that my kid doesn’t know what “anonymously” means, this is very bad coaching for a budding communicator. The 360-degree feedback system is a crutch for poor managers. We need more forthright discussion among our teams, not sneaky group feedback mechanisms masquerading as career development tools. What to do instead: Ditch the 360 system and teach your employees how to give one another constructive criticism. (Teach your managers how to do it, too.)

9. Mandatory Performance-Review Bell Curves

The evil twin to forced ranking systems is the annual review protocol that commands managers to assign their employees in equal numbers into groups of Poor, Fair, Good, Above Average, and Excellent employees. If a CEO has so little faith in his or her managers that she’d plan for, much less settle for, a workforce where 50% of the people range from so-so to dismal, that CEO requires too little from the management team. Forcing performance-review (and salary-increase) distributions into a bell curve exalts and institutionalizes mediocrity. What to do instead: Set high standards for employee reviews and raise them every year. Counsel or remove managers who can’t move past Easy Grader status, and trust the rest of your managers to review their employees fairly. If you can’t trust your leadership team members to assess their employees, how can you trust them to manage at all?

10. Timekeeping Courtesy of Henry Ford

If you employ white-collar “knowledge workers” in your organization, you’re better off giving them challenging assignments and standing back than managing them like assembly-line workers. An obsession with arrival and departure times is not the way to signal to your employees, “We’re expecting great things from you,” and neither are picky payroll practices that require salaried employees to use fractions of sick and personal days to attend to pressing life situations. Nothing spells “you’re a cog in the machine” like a policy that happily allows you to work until midnight on a client project, then docks your pay when you’re half an hour late arriving to work the next day. What to do instead: Set goals with your salaried employees, see that they meet them, and leave the how-and-where issues to your brilliant team members to manage for themselves.

Your most favouritest Business Project Manager

CEO's Prefer Magenta and CEO's are Not Controlling

CEO’s Prefer Magenta and CEO’s are Not Controlling

by leon[edit]

Dewey Sadka, who’s spent 15 years developing the test, said the color choices paint a picture of the typical CEO as sensitive, cooperative, and not a perfectionist. He or she actually is less controlling than the rest of the population – and more likely to be emotionally unstable – Article by By Courtney Rubin

A panel of 900 CEOs organized by USA Today participated in an online 60-second color personality test, and the results were striking: The bosses don’t like yellow or red, but they’re big fans of magenta – at least compared to the rest of the population.

If your favorite primary color is yellow, you’re information-driven – a communicator who can create profitable perspectives. Blues are idea-driven activists and red are results- (and money-) driven. Of the secondary colors, if green is your pick, you’re a realistic evaluator of situations. Purple confirms you enjoy a good fact-finding mission, and orange says you focus on what’s workable. For the third set, the achromatics, favoring black says value is your top priority, white says you like options, and brown says you’re a doer – you like putting systems and solutions in place and finishing jobs. (Thinking about using the test as a hiring tool? Click here.)

From Your Mostest Favouritest Interim Project Manager

The Process of Bye, Bye Mr SAP CEO

The Process of Bye, Bye Mr SAP CEO

by leon[edit]

IT will be no comfort to Léo Apotheker that he has made history as one of the shortest-lived bosses of a global technology company. He had taken the helm at SAP, the world’s third-biggest software firm, only in May. So there was great surprise when the company announced his departure on Sunday February 7th. Mr Apotheker resigned after SAP’s supervisory board had decided not to extend his contract.

In more than one way, Mr Apotheker was the victim of bad timing. He had to deal with the economic crisis by cutting costs sharply. SAP’s profits fell by 4% to $1.8 billion in 2009 and revenues dropped even more steeply, by 8% to $10.7 billion. Mr Apotheker also had to save Business ByDesign, SAP’s troubled attempt to offer software as an online service. And he had to deal with the aftermath of an ill-conceived plan to increase maintenance fees, which customers have to pay to get upgrades and support on products they have previously bought.

That said, Mr Apotheker’s performance was less than stellar. It was only in January, after months of customer backlash, that SAP finally decided to scrap the fee increases. Even more important, he never quite managed to win over SAP’s staff, especially in Walldorf, the German town where the firm has its headquarters. According to a recent internal survey, only half of SAP’s 50,000 employees still have confidence in the firm’s top management.

So sorry Mr Apotheker – From Your Most Favorite Business Process Analyst and Thanks to The Economist – The Full Economist Report

leon